FOLLOW FS HERE
Harry Potter: JK Rowling changed her mind about permanently killing Ron Weasley
Rowling said she was just thinking about doing this “out of sheer spite”. And, out of Harry, Ron and Hermione, Ron was the first person on the chopping block for the series.
She said: “I did seriously consider killing Ron.”
The writer did not reveal why she ultimately changed her mind, but the story certainly could have had a different feeling ending if she did go ahead with killing Ron.
Although Harry went on to save the world and defeat Lord Voldemort, he would have done so to the detriment of one of his only friends in the world.
What’s more, it would have ruined the life Hermione would have had, as well.
DON’T MISS…
Harry Potter’s Bonnie Wright is ‘deprogramming societal norms’ [NEWS]
‘Just f***ing cast him!’ Harry Potter star called on to play Wolverine [INFO]
Fantastic Beasts: The secrets of Dumbledore review – Not as magical [REVIEW]
23 Book Scenes So Controversial They Weren’t Included In The Movie Adaptation
After bratty Eustace gets changed into a dragon, he learns his lesson about being more grateful for what he has and Aslan shows up to change him back. The scene is essentially the same in both the book and the movie, with just one difference.
In the movie, Aslan claws at the sand three times, which causes Eustace’s scales to slowly tear away. He then roars, and Eustace is fully changed back to a boy.
In the book, Aslan first tells Eustace to “undress”. Eustace starts clawing at his own dragon skin, which starts peeling off. He keeps tearing away layers of his skin until he gives up, seeing no significant change. Then Aslan steps in and starts clawing at his body, tearing away more skin.
While the movie shows dazzling golden light as the skin transforms, the book is much more literal. Eustace says it “hurt worse than anything I’ve ever felt,” and compares it to peeling off a scab. Since the whole thing is one big metaphor anyway, it makes sense why the filmmakers made the changes they did. You can check out the movie version here.
Latest Sinhala Movies 2022 | New Sinhala Releases & Showtimes in Sri …
Thank You!
Your Response has been received successfully.
We will get back to you shortly.
Emma Watson’s Net Worth Reveals if She Made More For ‘Harry Potter’ or ‘Beauty & the Beast’
If you loved her as both Hermione and Belle, you may want to know about Emma Watson’s net worth and whether she made more from the Harry Potter movies or Beauty and the Beast.
Watson—whose full name is Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson—was born on April 15, 1990, in Paris, France. Her parents, Chris Watson and Jacqueline Luesby, were both lawyers. When she was five years old, Watson moved to England after her parents’ divorce. She would stay in Oxfordshire with her mother during the week and spend weekends with her father in London. In 2000, Watson was cast as Hermione Granger, a witch and one of Harry Potter’s best friends, in the movie adaptation of J.K. Rowling‘s 1997 best seller, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, which followed Harry and his friends, Hermione and Ron Weasley, as they attended the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, while defending the wizarding world from Lord Voldemort, a dark wizard who killed Harry’s parents and wants to rule both the magical and non-magical universe.
In an interview with W magazine in 2014, Watson revealed that she was was cast because of how “obsessive” she was over the role. “I got the role as Hermione in Harry Potter. I was nine and I loved learning my lines,” she said. “I was completely obsessive and I would do it over and over and over again. Funnily enough, in the first Harry Potter film, if you watch carefully in some scenes you can see me mouthing Harry and Ron’s lines as well as my own because that’s just what I was like. I was crazy.” She continued, “I ended up doing eight auditions to get my role. I auditioned with maybe three or four different sets of Harrys. I would just literally like sit by the telephone and wait to get a phone call and sometimes it would be weeks. I learned then if you’re waiting for something to come it never comes. The phone call always came when I was out of the house. Always.”
When she was told she’d been cast, Watson still didn’t believe the news. “They called me into the producer David Heyman’s very like pristine white office and he said ‘We just wanted to tell you that you are the preferred candidate for the role of Hermoine’. And I kept thinking ‘What does preferred candidate mean?’” she said. After she confirmed the news, it didn’t take long for Watson and her Harry Potter co-stars, Daniel Radcliffe and Ruper Grint, to become overnight celebrities. “Within about half an hour they’d taken a photograph of Dan, Rupert and I which was then broadcast on the Internet that the three us had been cast,” Watson said. “We moved straight into a hotel. There were press outside our house. It was like this crazy whirlwind; like something from a movie.”
So what is Emma Watson’s net worth and how much did she make from the Harry Potter movies versus Beauty and the Beast? Read on for what we know about Emma Watson’s net worth and what her pay was like for the movie franchise that made her a household name.
What did Emma Watson make for the Harry Potter movies?
Image: Warner Bros. Ent./Courtesy Everett Collection
What did Emma Watson make for the Harry Potter movies? Watson starred as Hermione Granger—a witch and one of Harry Potter’s best friends—in eight Harry Potter movies: 2001’s Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, 2002’s Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, 2004’s Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, 2005’s Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, 2007’s Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, 2009’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, 2010’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 and 2011’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2.
So how much did Emma Watson make for the Harry Potter movies? Watson made $60 million from the eight Harry Potter movies, according to The Hollywood Reporter, which equates to around $70 million when adjusting for inflation. While her pay for the first four Harry Potter movies isn’t known, Celebrity Net Worth reports that Watson made $4 million for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix in 2007 and a combined $30 million for the last two Harry Potter movies, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, in 2010 and 2011. (Her salary for the sixth Harry Potter movie, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, isn’t known.) While $70 million from eight Harry Potter movies is a lot, Watson’s salary was a fraction of what Daniel Radcliffe (who played Harry Potter) made from the films. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Radcliffe made a total of $109 million from the eight Harry Potter movies (almost double what Watson earned), with $50 million from the last two Harry Potter movies alone. As for the Harry Potter movies, the eight films have grossed a total of $7.7 billion.
In an interview with British Vogue in 2019, Watson revealed that she didn’t know how much she made from the Harry Potter movies until her father told her. when she was 18 years old. “By the third or fourth film, the money was starting to get serious,” she said.. “I had no idea. I felt sick, very emotional.” According to Watson, she only received $75 a week as an allowance. When her dad did have the “money talk with her,” Watson recalled how shocked she was to learn what she made from the Harry Potter movies. “I had no idea. I felt sick and very emotional,” she said. After she learned about her net worth, Watson revealed that she took a course at Coutts bank to learn how to manage her money.
Watson also told Interview in 2009 about her first big splurges with her Harry Potter money. “I got myself a laptop. I took my dad to Tuscany. He works so hard, my dad, so I rang up his secretary and asked when he was free, and I booked us a holiday. What else? Oh, I got myself a car,” she said. She continued, “I got my license last year, and I love the Prius, even if my friends say it’s ugly. They say I drive a brick. And, to be fair, it’s not the prettiest car on the road, but it’s good for the environment. It’s sensible and boring—like me.”
What did Emma Watson make for Beauty and the Beast?
Image: Laurie Sparham /© Walt Disney Pictures /courtesy Everett Collection.
What did Emma Watson make for Beauty and the Beast? Watson starred as Belle in Disney’s live-action adaptation of Beauty and the Beast in 2017. The movie was based on Disney’s 1991 movie of the same title, which is based on Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont’s 1756 version of the fairy tale and stars the voice of Paige O’Hara as Belle.
So how much did Emma Watson make for Beauty and the Beast? According to The Hollywood Reporter, Watson made $3 million for Beauty and the Beast, with an additional $15 million in bonuses based on the movie’s box office performance. In total, Beauty and the Beast grossed $504 million in the United States and Canada and $759.5 million in other countries for a total worldwide gross of $1.263 billion. While $3 million from Beauty and the Beast is a lot, the amount is a fraction of the $70 million Watson made for the eight Harry Potter movies and is $1 million less than what she made for 2007’s Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Watson also isn’t the highest-paid live-action Disney star. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Angelina Jolie made $20 million for 2014’s Maleficent while Will Smith asked for $20 million for 2019’s Dumbo, which eventually starred Colin Farrell.
In an interview with ABC in 2017, director Bill Bondon revealed why Watson was cast as Belle in the live-action Beauty and the Beast. “Emma Watson was our first—and really our only—choice for Belle,”he said. “For a lot of reasons: her talent, her beauty, her intelligence.” He continued, “Emma Watson is a twenty-first century, very strong female role model.
How much is Emma Watson’s net worth?
Image: Courtesy of HBO Max.
How much is Emma Watson’s net worth? Watson is worth $85 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth. Along with the $70 million she made from the Harry Potter movies and the $3 million she made from Beauty and the Beast, Emma Watson’s net worth also includes what she’s made from movies like The Tale of Despereaux, My Week with Marilyn, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, The Bling Ring and Little Women. In addition to her acting career, Watson also has a bachelor’s degree in English literature from Brown University, which she graduated from in 2014, and is a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador. In 2014, she helped launch the UN Women campaign HeForShe, which advocates for gender equality. She’s also a founding member of Time’s Up UK.
According to Celebrity Net Worth, Watson has also earned tens of millions of dollars from endorsements with brands like Calvin Klein, Lancome, Dolce Gabbanna and Burberry. She also designed a clothing line with sustainable fashion brand People Tree and is on the board of directors of Kerig, a luxury brand group, as an advocate for sustainable fashion.
Watson told Interview magazine in 2017 that she—as well as her Harry Potter co-stars, Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint—struggle with fame because of their success at such a young age. “It’s one of the things that I struggle with, because the three of us—Dan, Rupert and I—were kids when we got cast in this fairy-tale series, and what happened to us was kind of a fantasy story in itself. Outside of the movies,” she said. “So the story of my life has been of public interest, which is why I’ve been so passionate about having a private identity. When I step into a character, people have to be able to suspend their disbelief; they have to be able to divorce me from that girl.” She continued, “And not having everyone know every single intimate detail of my entire life is part of me trying to protect my ability to do my job well.”
Watson also talked about the “fear” of messing up as someone in the public eye. “I know that I’m under a different microscope, a certain level of scrutiny, which I find really hard at times,” Watson said. “And sometimes the fear of doing things is overwhelming. I get incredibly overwhelmed, and sometimes feel hemmed in by that, afraid of that.” She continued, “I know that if I live in that fear, then my life as an artist, as a human being, really, is over. Ultimately, it will silence me, and it will silence what is in me—which I have yet to explore and uncover.”
In an interview with Vanity Fair in 2017, Watson revealed why she often doesn’t take photographs with fans. “For me, it’s the difference between being able to have a life and not. If someone takes a photograph of me and posts it, within two seconds they’ve created a marker of exactly where I am within 10 meters,” she said. “They can see what I’m wearing and who I’m with. I just can’t give that tracking data.” She continued, “I’ll say, ‘I will sit here and answer every single Harry Potter fandom question you have but I just can’t do a picture.’ I have to carefully pick and choose my moment to interact. When am I a celebrity sighting versus when am I going to make someone’s freakin’ week? Children I don’t say no to, for example.”
Harry Potter: Return to Hogwarts is available to stream on HBO Max. Here’s how to watch it for free.
Image: Courtesy of Adams Media.
The Unofficial Harry Potter Cookbook by Dinah Bucholz
For more about Harry Potter, check out The Unofficial Harry Potter Cookbook
by Dinah Bucholz. The New York Times bestseller features more than 150 recipes from the Harry Potter universe, from cauldron cakes to knickerbocker glories, for fans to re-create at home, regardless of if they’re wizard, witch or muggle. Other spell-binding recipes include Hagrid’s rock cakes, treacle tarts (Harry’s favorite dessert), Molly’s meat pies (Mrs. Weasley’s classic dish) and Kreacher’s French onion soup pumpkin pasties, a staple on the Hogwarts Express cart. The Unofficial Harry Potter Cookbook is a must-have for any Harry Potter fan who wants to know what it’s really like to eat in Hogwarts’ dining hall. For more Harry Potter collectible items, check out our Harry Potter gift guide here.
Our mission at STYLECASTER is to bring style to the people, and we only feature products we think you’ll love as much as we do. Please note that if you purchase something by clicking on a link within this story, we may receive a small commission of the sale.
‘RRR’, ‘Radhe Shyam’, ‘The Batman’: Films to watch in theatres in March
to get the latest news, gossip on your favourite stars oven-fresh movie reviews from top reviewers right in your inbox.
DVD releases | 2021 | Movies and TV Shows on DVD
Copyright © 2022 Tribute Entertainment Media Group
Last Updated: May 25, 2022
LEGO Harry Potter Summer 2022 sets revealed, including 12 Grimmauld Place, Shrieking Shack and more [News]
Today LEGO has revealed six new Harry Potter sets today, publishing the listings on their website. The sets span the full breadth from the small, 121-piece 76400 Hogwarts Carriage and Thestrals up to the large 1,083-piece 76408 12 Grimmauld Place. That’s the first time 12 Grimmauld Place has been a LEGO set, and the Ministry of Magic also gets a first appearance. Of course, the sets include lots of new minifigure designs for old favorites, and there are even some brand new characters that have never been in minifigure form before, such as Albert Runcorn, Mafalda Hopkirk, and Reg Mary Cattermole. Several of the sets continue the modular Hogwarts system that LEGO’s been developing for a number of years, with some of them beginning to revisit locations featured in previous modular Hogwarts sets, such as the Womping Willow. All six of the sets are slated to be available starting June 19.
Check out more info and pictures of the sets below, and don’t miss these other upcoming LEGO sets for Spring and Summer 2022:
- LEGO 10300 Back to the Future Time Machine
- LEGO 76989 Horizon Forbidden West: Tallneck
- LEGO Disney Pixar’s Lightyear sets
- LEGO Ideas upcoming sets
- LEGO Jurassic World Jurassic Park
- LEGO Jurassic World full lineup
- LEGO Marvel Thor: Love Thunder Goat Boat
- LEGO Star Wars Diorama Collection
- LEGO Star Wars 75325 The Mandalorian’s N-1 Starfighter
76400 Hogwarts Carriage and Thestrals | 121 pieces | Available June 19 | US $19.99 | CAN $24.99 | UK £17.99
76401 Hogwarts Courtyard: Sirius’s Rescue | 345 pieces | Available June 19 | US $49.99 | CAN $64.99 | UK £44.99
76402 Hogwarts: Dumbledore’s Office | 654 pieces | Available June 19 | US $79.99 | CAN $109.99 | UK £69.99
76403 The Ministry of Magic | 990 pieces | Available June 19 | US $99.99 | CAN $129.99 | UK £89.99
76406 Hungarian Horntail Dragon | 671 pieces | Available June 19 | US $49.99 | CAN $64.99 | UK £44.99
76407 The Shrieking Shack Whomping Willow | 777 pieces | Available June 19 | US $89.99 | CAN $119.99 | UK £79.99
76408 12 Grimmauld Place | 1,083 pieces | Available June 19 | US $119.99 | CAN $149.99 | UK £114.99
Yet Another Trailer for the Next Bad Video Game Movie ‘Uncharted’
Yet Another Trailer for the Next Bad Video Game Movie ‘Uncharted’
by Alex Billington
January 27, 2022
Source: YouTube
“You have no idea who you partnered with.” Tell that to the video game studio… Sony Pictures has revealed another new official trailer, the third one so far, for the Uncharted movie. It’s based on the popular video game series about an adventurer named Nathan Drake, and it looks as bad as every other video game movie before it. Tom Holland stars as Drake, who goes on his first treasure hunting adventure with wisecracking partner Victor “Sully” Sullivan, played by Mark Wahlberg. The main cast also includes Sophia Ali, Tati Gabrielle, and Antonio Banderas. We’ve posted two other full trailers for this already, but none of them are looking any better. Maybe it will be so bad that it’s actually fun? But it also seems like they totally forgot about what makes the game great and how that could translate to the big screen and made something else.
Here’s the third trailer (+ another poster) for Ruben Fleischer’s Uncharted, direct from YouTube:
You can watch the first official trailer for Fleischer’s Uncharted movie here, or full second trailer here.
Based on one of the best-selling, most critically acclaimed video game series of all time, Sony Pictures’ Uncharted introduces audiences to the young street-smart Nathan Drake (Tom Holland) and showcases his first treasure hunting adventure with wisecracking partner Victor “Sully” Sullivan (Mark Wahlberg). In an action-adventure epic that spans the globe, the two go in dangerous pursuit of “the greatest treasure never found” while also tracking clues that may lead to Nathan’s long-lost brother. Uncharted is directed by American filmmaker Ruben Fleischer, director of the films Zombieland, 30 Minutes or Less, Gangster Squad, Venom, and Zombieland: Double Tap previously. The screenplay is written by Rafe Judkins and Art Marcum Matt Holloway, from a story by Rafe Judkins. Based on the PlayStation video game by Naughty Dog. Produced by Charles Roven, Avi Arad, Alex Gartner, and Ari Arad. Sony Pictures will debut Uncharted in theaters exclusively starting on February 18th, 2022 early next year. Look any better? Want to watch?