For the previous 20 years, nobody is really pleased with cable; folks would be very eager to have it at the start, but once they did, did they ever hate the way they had to pay for channels they didn’t watch, and the way the cable guy would keep them waiting should there be a complaint.
There is survey after survey that says that about 60% of all cable TV subscribers in America are terribly unsatisfied with their subscriptions, and the rest are not too happy either. Why, if you go by what the American Customer Satisfaction Index says, people hate Comcast even more than they hate the IRS. If the common impression about cable was optimistic, they shouldn’t have created Jim Carrey’s movie, or such episode in Seinfeld wherein Kramer resolves on keeping in company of the cable guy for a difference.
People had believed that if they could manage to pay for direct satellite TV in the future, it would save them out of their displeasing connection with Comcast or Warner. These days, people can manage to pay for a dish without that much hassles. But are they really more contented than before? If that’s what you think, perhaps you’re not really familiar with how unkind life tends to be.
The state of Washington had sued the direct satellite TV programming company (DirecTV) for all their schemes of typical and bizarre devious deceits done on their consumers, not at all distinct from what Comcast has done. Actually, the Attorney General, the one who is prosecuting the case, has even said that the rot runs so deep in the way DirecTV systematically milks its customers, that it looks like thievery was their entire business model. In an interview, that official says he had to look hard to find a rule or two that they hadn’t used from the cheating copybook. Thus, what did the people from DirecTV really carry out and how did all of these begin?
It all started with a bunch of consumer complaints against DirecTV that came after intense advertising they put out to try to sell a new channel to new customers at an affordable $29.99 a month. They just tell you enough to get you to sign a two-year contract at that price. And at the end of the first year, finding out that they are increasing the charge, you can only stop if you pay the $480 for the fines. But that is just one out of all the numerous allegations against them in the proceedings.
Here are some of the other beauties in this direct satellite TV company’s service plans. The fine print in their advertising is unreadable, so fine is the print. If you don’t pay their bill by an automatic method, you pay a fine.
Once you accept a channel for a free trial, they register you for a charged subscription by the end of the trial even if you don’t wish for it. And no matter how hard you try, you can’t find them giving you all the rules in one sheet, or one place. You would come across one policy printed on the receipt of the store, a few on their website, some in the contract you signed, and all that. Apparently the official term for this kind of dealing is called layering.
And that’s all of it; and you believed that if you do not own a cable operating in your house, you would certainly have a far more flexible arrangement. Obviously, DirecTV renounces everything; the State of California is not believing it and they even charge another inferior direct satellite TV company also. It looks like those entertainment providers have a great deal of imagination when it comes to ruining it. Find the low -cost satellite tv companies for your best satellite tv deals.